Science and economy interrelation

Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.3.4
  • Gennady V. Shepelev SRI Federal Research Centre for Projects Evaluation and Consulting Services, Moscow, Russian Federation shepelev-2@mail.ru
    Elibrary Author_id 567080
How to Cite
Shepelev G.V. Science and economy interrelation. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2020. Vol. 2. No. 3. P. 70-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.3.4

Abstract

The model of interrelation between science and Economics is considered. The analysis of scientific research as a specific economic activity is carried out. The role of state and non-state financing in the organization of business based on scientific research is investigated. Based on the proposed concept the processes of forming the demand for scientific research are studied. In particular, explanations are given for the lack of business demand on research results. The role of the state in forming a request for scientific research for various sectors of science is shown.
Keywords:
science management system, priorities, applied research, exploratory and fundamental research, research performance indicators, business demand for research results

Author Biography

Gennady V. Shepelev, SRI Federal Research Centre for Projects Evaluation and Consulting Services, Moscow, Russian Federation
Candidate of physical and mathematical Sciences, advisor to director general

References

1. Shepelev, G. V. (2020). On the governance of Russian science. Science management: Theory and Practice. Vol. 2. No. 2. Pp. 65–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.2.3 (In Russ.).

2. Indikatory innovatsionnoi deyatel’nosti: 2019. Statisticheskii sbornik [Indicators of innovation activity: 2019. Statistical book]. (2019). Ed. by L. M. Gokhberg, K. A. Ditkovskii, I. A. Kuznetsova and others. Moscow: NRU HSE publ. 376 p. (In Russ.).

3. Mau V. Rossiiskaya ehkonomika ne vosprinimaet innovatsii [The Russian economy does not accept innovations]. (2010). Forbes.ru. March 16. URL: https://www.forbes.ru/column/46400-innovatsii-eto-problema (accessed 18.08.2020).

4. Rossiiskii statisticheskii ezhegodnik 2019: Stat. sb. [Russian statistical Yearbook 2019: Stat. sat]. (2019). Moscow: Rosstat. 708 p. (In Russ.)

5. Otkrytaya diskussiya: Reforma nauki: put’ k spaseniyu ili imitatsiya deyatel’nosti? [Open discussion: the Reform of science: a way to escape or an imitation of an activity?] (2011). Sakharov center. March 15. URL: http://old2.sakharov-center.ru/discussions/?id=700 (accessed 30.07.2020). (In Russ.).

6. OECD. Main Science and Technology Indicators. (2020). Vol. 2019. Iss. 2. Paris: OECD Publishing. 84 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/g2g9ff07-en

7. OECD. Stat. URL: https://stats.oecd.org/ (accessed 30.07.2020).

8. Portal informatsionnogo obespecheniya proektov KNTPiP [The portal of information support of the projects of CNTPiP] (2020). URL: https://kntp.ntr.ru/landing (accessed 30.07.2020). (In Russ.).

9. Strategiya nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii utverzhdena Ukazom Prezidenta RF ot 1 dekabrya 2016 g. No. 642 [The strategy for scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation was approved by Presidential Decree No. 642 of December 1, 2016]. (2016). ConsultantPlus. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_207967/ (accessed 15.08.2020). (In Russ.).
Article

Received: 22.06.2020

Accepted: 25.09.2020

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Shepelev, G. V. (2020). Science and economy interrelation. Science Management: Theory and Practice, 2(3), 70-90. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.3.4
Issue
Vol 2 No 3 (2020): Science Management: Theory and Practice
Section
Mechanisms of a state regulation of a scientific activity