Visibility of scientific results Green Open Access in institutional repositories
-
Marina V. Valeeva
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
m.v.shcherbakova@urfu.ru
Elibrary Author_id 824608How to CiteValeeva M.V. Visibility of scientific results Green Open Access in institutional repositories. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2020. Vol. 2. No. 2. P. 117-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.2.5
Abstract
Open access gives free access to research publications and today, about 23% of scientific publications in Russia are in the public domain. How and to what extent an open access publication affects citation - issues that have been the subject of debate for quite some time, and of course, the type of open access in which the article is posted plays an important role here. Now, the most common are the “golden” and “green” types of open access, each of which has both advantages and disadvantages. The article presents the results of a study conducted in 2018, during which the degree of using the capabilities of Gold Open Access and Green Open Access by universities of the 5-100 project, as well as Moscow State University, St. Petersburg State University and the RAS institutes (namely, the Ural Branch of the RAS and the SB RAS). The analysis included articles located in Scopus - Gold Open Access and Green Open Access. Also, as part of the study, the authors analyzed the case of the UralFederal University named after B.N. Yeltsin, in the framework of which the success of the institutional repository was evaluated Electronic scientific archive of Ural Federal University (elar.urfu).Keywords:open access, gold open access, green open access, open science, scientometrics, institutional repositoriesReferences
1. Suber, P. (2008). Gratis and libre open access. SPARC Open Access Newsletter. August.
URL: https://sparcopen.org/our-work/gratis-and-libre-open-access/ (accessed 10.04.2020).
2. Walker, T. (1998). Free Internet Access to Traditional Journals. American Scientist: magazine. Vol. 86. No. 5. P. 463. DOI:10.1511/1998.5.463
3. Laakso, M. and Björk, B.-С. (2013). Delayed Open Access – an overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 64. No. 7. P. 1323–1329. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22856.
4. Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., Haustein, S. (2019). Otkrytyi dostup segodnya: shirokomasshtabnyi analiz rasprostranennosti i vliyaniya statei otkrytogo dostupa [The State of OA: a Large-scale Analysis of the Prevalence and Impact of Open Access Articles]. Scholarly Research and Information. Vol. 2. No. 4. P. 228–247. https://doi.org/10.24108/2658-3143-2019-2-4-228-247 (In Russ.).
5. Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B. and Hartgerink, C. H. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review. F1000 Research. June. Article 632.
6. Priem, J. and Piwowar, H. (2018). The Unpaywall Dataset. Figshare. Journal contribution. March 23. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6020078 (accessed 20.04.2020).
7. SHERPA/RoMEO. URL: http://sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/index.php (accessed 24.04.2020).
8. Ranking Web of Repositories. URL: http://repositories.webometrics.info/en/top_Inst (accessed July 2017 (Cancelled)).
ArticleAccepted: 15.06.2020
Citation FormatsOther cite formats:
APAValeeva, M. V. (2020). Visibility of scientific results Green Open Access in institutional repositories. Science Management: Theory and Practice, 2(2), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.2.5SectionScience in the mirror of scientometric
