Promotion of Intellectual Activity Results of Scientific Organizations. Regulatory Framework and Statistics

Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2024.6.1.3
EDN: FMLGJS
  • Irina A. Ganieva Research and Academic Centre “Kuzbass”, Kemerovo, Russia ikolesni@mail.ru
    Elibrary Author_id 504345
  • Gennady V. Shepelev Research and Academic Centre “Kuzbass”, Kemerovo, Russia shepelev-2@mail.ru
    Elibrary Author_id 567080
Acknowledgments
The work was carried out with the support from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Agreement No. 075-10-2022-115 dated September 28, 2022 “Development and Implementation of an Effective Management System for Research, Innovation, Production and Launch of New Products on the Basis of Scientific and Industrial Partnership of Scientific and Educational Organizations and Real Business”.
How to Cite
Ganieva I.A., Shepelev G.V. Promotion of Intellectual Activity Results of Scientific Organizations. Regulatory Framework and Statistics. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2024. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 49-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2024.6.1.3

Abstract

We consider intellectual activity results (IAR) of scientific organizations in the context of intellectual property protection and as one of the indicators of their effectiveness. The data characterizing Russia’s place in the world rankings in terms of the number of patent applications and the number of applications per 1 million people are presented, and a conclusion is made about the relatively low activity in protecting IAR in comparison with the leaders of the ratings. The authors have conducted an analysis of normative legal acts (NLA) on the consolidation and transfer of rights to IAR, as well as NLA that characterize IAR in terms of the effectiveness of research activity, as well as of the certification of researchers. It is concluded that the current system of NLA does not impede or discourage the work of scientific organizations with IAR. It is shown that NLA related to the evaluation of the effectiveness of scientific institutions should also stimulate their active work with IAR. At the same time, the available statistical data on the share of research organizations in patent applications filed and licenses sold indicate that their activity in promoting IAR in the real sector of the economy is on average more than twice lower than in Russia as a whole. It is assumed that the evolving situation regarding working with IAR is determined by economic factors. We have outlined ways for further research on factors that can significantly affect the activity of scientific organizations in working with the promotion of IAR, in particular, to assess the potential demand for IAR and the prospective value of IAR from the points of view of the seller and the buyer.
Keywords:
intellectual activity results, IAR, regulatory framework for working with IAR, efficiency indicators of research organizations

Author Biographies

Irina A. Ganieva, Research and Academic Centre “Kuzbass”, Kemerovo, Russia
Doctor of Economics, Director
Gennady V. Shepelev, Research and Academic Centre “Kuzbass”, Kemerovo, Russia
Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Leading Specialist

References

1. Shepelev G. V. On the evaluation of the effectiveness of scientific research. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2021;3(4):123–145. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/smtp.2021.3.4.15.

2. Shepelev G. V. Requirements for the Russian publications system under sanctions pressure. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2022;4(3):105–128. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/smtp.2022.4.3.8.

3. Facts and figures. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). February 2022. Available at: https://wipo.int/edocs/infogdocs/en/ipfactsandfigures/ (accessed: 11.01.2024).

4. Arsentiev M. V., Dezhina I. G., Klyucharev G. A. [et al.]. Knowledge-intensive industries in the system of interaction of institutions [Naukoemkie proizvodstva v sisteme vzaimodeistviya institutov] : Monograph. Moscow : FCTAS RAS; 2021. 352 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-89697-334-8.

5. Methodic recommendations for the regions on the commercialization of IP assets [Metodicheskie rekomendatsii dlya regionov po kommertsializatsii RID] / comp. by S. Yu. Ulyashina. Moscow : The Federal Institute of Industrial Property (FIPS); 2021. 43 p. (In Russ.).

6. Ignatov I. I. The role of Bayh-Dole act of 1980 in the knowledge and technology transfer from the U. S. universities to the corporate sector: An assessment of the 30-year way. Science. Innovations. Education. 2012;7(12):159–188. (In Russ.).

7. Lanshina T. A. Academic spin-offs in the U.S. economy. Russia and America in the 21st Century. 2015;(3). Available at: https://rusus.ru/?act=read&id=476 (accessed: 17.12.2023). (In Russ.).

8. Chrystal A., Mizen P. Goodhart’s law: Its origins, meaning and implications for monetary policy. In: Mizen P., editor. Central banking, monetary theory and practice: Essays in honour of Charles Goodhart. Vol. 1. Cheltenham ; Northampton, MA : Edward Elgar; 2003. p. 221–243. DOI 10.4337/9781781950777.00022.

9. Zinovieva I. V., Inozemtseva S. N., Mindeli L. E. [et al.]. Russian Academy of Sciences in numbers: 2012 [Rossiiskaya akademiya nauk v tsifrakh: 2012] : Statistics digest. Moscow : The Institute for the Study of Science of the RAS (ISS RAS); 2013. 239 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-91294-062-0.

10. Gorodnikova N. V., Gokhberg L. M., Gracheva G. A. [et al.]. Science and technology indicators in the Russian Federation: 2012 [Indikatory nauki: 2012] : Data book. Moscow : HSE University; 2012. 392 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-7218-1255-2.

11. Voynilov Yu. L., Gorodnikova N. V., Gokhberg L. M. [et al.]. Science and technology indicators in the Russian Federation: 2017 [Indikatory nauki: 2017] : Data book. Moscow : HSE University; 2017. 304 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-7598-1555-6. DOI 10.17323/978-5-7598-1555-6.

12. Shepelev G. V. On expert evaluation of the scientific research effectiveness. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2022;4(4):25–47. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.2.

13. Zinovieva I. V., Inozemtseva S. N., Mindeli L. E. [et al.]. Science in the institutions of the Federal Agency of Scientific Organizations: 2016 [Nauka v uchrezhdeniyakh Federal'nogo agentstva nauchnykh organizatsii: 2016] : Statistics digest. Moscow : The Institute for the Study of Science of the RAS (ISS RAS); 2017. 220 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-91294-110-8.

14. Vlasova V. V., Gokhberg L. M., Gracheva G. A. [et al.]. Indicators of innovation in the Russian Federation: 2023 [Indikatory innovatsionnoi deyatel'nosti: 2023] : Data book. Moscow : HSE University; 2023. 292 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-7598-2749-8. DOI 10.17323/978-5-7598-2749-8.

15. Vlasova V. V., Gokhberg L. M., Ditkovskiy K. A. [et al.]. Science and technology indicators in the Russian Federation: 2023 [Indikatory nauki: 2023] : Data book. Moscow : HSE University; 2023. 416 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-7598-2765-8. DOI 10.17323/978-5-7598-2765-8.
EDN QR Сode FMLGJS
Article

Received: 04.12.2023

Accepted: 25.03.2024

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Ganieva, I. A., & Shepelev, G. V. (2024). Promotion of Intellectual Activity Results of Scientific Organizations. Regulatory Framework and Statistics. Science Management: Theory and Practice, 6(1), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2024.6.1.3
Issue
Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Science Management: Theory and Practice
Section
Scientific policy