Radical and Incremental Innovations: Difficulties in Definition and Differentiation

Research Article
How to Cite
Samovoleva S.A. Radical and Incremental Innovations: Difficulties in Definition and Differentiation. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2022. Vol. 4. No. 4. P. 117-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.7 (in Russ.).

Abstract

The differentiation of innovation into radical and incremental is widespread in the economic literature. It seems simple at first glance, but it is not. Firstly, researchers focus on different features to distinguish these types of innovations. In other words, there is a variety of approaches to the definition of these innovations. Secondly, the proposed characteristics are often subjective. Thirdly, the difficulties in measuring radical and incremental innovations are related to the methodology for collecting relevant statistical data. Thus, the lack of a clear and consistent theoretical and methodological framework does not allow clear understandingof the incremental or radical nature of the innovation activities results and exact assessment of these results. However, researchers are not always given sufficient attention to these difficulties. This paper is devoted to the analysis of key issues that make it difficult to distinguish between incremental and radical innovations.
Keywords:
types of innovations, radical innovation, performance evaluating, statistics, competitiveness, export, innovation policy

Author Biography

Svetlana A. Samovoleva, Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the RAS, Moscow, Russia
PhD, Lead Research Associate

References

1. Dewar, R. D. and Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management science. Vol. 32, no. 11. P. 1422–1433.

2. Henderson, R. M. and Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative science quarterly. P. 9–30.

3. Garcia, R. and Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management: An international publication of the product development & management association. Vol. 19, no. 2. P. 110–132.

4. Sood, A. and Tellis, G. J. (2005). Technological evolution and radical innovation. Journal of marketing. Vol. 69, no. 3. P. 152–168.

5. Audretsch, D. and Aldridge, T. (2008). Radical innovation: literature review and development of an indicator. Draft Report to International Consortium on Entrepreneurship. P. 3–42.

6. Buisson, B. and Daidj, N. (2017). Explaining successful radical innovations with effectuation. In: Proceedings of the XXVIe Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique. Lyon, France, 7–9 June 2017. P. 1–24.

7. Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U. and Celik, M. A. (2022). Radical and incremental innovation: The roles of firms, managers, and innovators. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. Vol. 14, no. 3. P. 199–249.

8. Gokhberg, L. M., Kuznetsova, T. E. and Rud’, V. A. (2010). Analiz innovatsionnykh rezhimov v rossiiskoi ekonomike: metodologicheskie podkhody i pervye rezul’taty [Analysis of innovative regimes in the Russian economy: methodological approaches and first results]. Foresight. Vol. 4, no. 3. P. 18–30. (In Russ.).

9. Golichenko, O. G. (2010). Sovremennaya tekhnologicheskaya revolyutsiya i novye vozmozhnosti innovatsionnogo razvitiya «dogonyayushchikh» stran [Modern technological revolution and new opportunities for innovative development of “catching up” countries]. Innovations. No. 3. P. 12–22. (In Russ.).

10. Frolov, A. B. (2013). NBIC-technologies’ development in the USA. Innovations. No. 7 (177). P. 63–73. (In Russ.).

11. Golichenko, O. G. and Popov, A. B. (2021). Life cycle of the main product as an indicator of enterprises’ innovation advancement. Innovations. No. 3. P. 51–59. (In Russ.).

12. Cooke, P. (2018). Evolutionary complexity geography and the future of regional innovation and growth policies. Resilience and Regional Dynamics. P. 11–30.

13. Gumerova, G. I., Khyuzig, S., Shaimieva, E. Sh. and Sheve, G. (2021). O vidakh innovatsii po stepeni novizny: radikal’nye innovatsii (klassifikatsiya, primery, teoreticheskie podkhody k analizu keisov) [On the types of innovations according to the degree of novelty: radical innovations (classification, examples, theoretical approaches to case analysis)]. In: Nauchnye issledovaniya: fundamental’nye i prikladnye aspekty-2021: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov, Naberezhnye Chelny, 01 yanvarya – 31 dekabrya 2021 goda [Scientific research: fundamental and applied aspects – 2021 : Collection of scientific papers, Naberezhnye Chelny, January 01 – December 31, 2021]. Kazan: Poznanie. P. 84–87. (In Russ.).

14. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovators Dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.

15. Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E. and McDonald, R. (2015). What is disruptive innovation. Harvard Business Review. Vol. 93 (12). P. 44–53.

16. Zakharova, A. I. and Samovoleva, S. A. (2018). Marketing innovatsii: opredelenie i kharakternye osobennosti funktsii [Innovation marketing: definition and characteristic features of functions]. Drukerovskij vestnik. No. 5. P. 140–150. (In Russ.).

17. Coccia, M. (2016). Radical innovations as drivers of breakthroughs: characteristics and properties of the management of technology leading to superior organisational performance in the discovery process of R&D labs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. Vol. 28, no. 4. P. 381–395.

18. Cirera, X. and Maloney, W. F. (2017). The innovation paradox: Developing-country capabilities and the unrealized promise of technological catch-up. World Bank Publications.

19. Hervás-Oliver, J. L., Albors-Garrigos, J., Estelles-Miguel, S. and Boronat-Moll, C. (2018). Radical Innovation in Marshallian industrial districts. Regional Studies. Vol. 52, no. 10. P. 1388–1397.

20. OECD, Eurostat. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. 4th ed., The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. (2018). Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg: OECD Publishing.

21. Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Sempere-Ripoll, F. and Moll, C. B. (2022). Zooming into firms’ location, capabilities and innovation performance: Does agglomeration foster incremental or radical innovation? European Research on Management and Business Economics. Vol. 28, no. 2. P. 100186.

22. Ireland, R. D. and Webb, J. W. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation. Business horizons. Vol. 50, no. №. 1. P. 49–59.

23. Dement’ev, V. E. (2016). Glava 5. Dlinnye volny v ekonomike: institutsional’nyi aspect [Chapter 5. Long waves in the economy: the institutional aspect]. Krizisy i prognozy v svete teorii dlinnykh voln [Crises and forecasts in the light of the theory of long waves]. Ed. by L. E. Grinin, A. V. Korotaev, R. S. Grinberg. Moscow: Uchitel’. P. 123–139. (In Russ.).

24. Pavlova, O. N. (2017). Ekonomika znanii [Knowledge economy.]. St-Petersburg: Universitet ITMO. 123 p. (In Russ.).

25. Coccia, M. (2017). Sources of technological innovation: Radical and incremental innovation problem-driven to support competitive advantage of firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. Vol. 29, no. 9. P. 1048–1061.

26. Verhoeven, D., Bakker, J. and Veugelers, R. (2016). Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators. Research policy. Vol. 45, no. 3. P. 707–723.

27. Linton, J. D. (2009). De-babelizing the language of innovation. Technovation. Vol. 29. no. 11. P. 729–737.

28. Therrien, P., Doloreux, D. and Chamberlin, T. (2011). Innovation novelty and (commercial) performance in the service sector: A Canadian firm-level analysis. Technovation. Vol. 31, no. 12. P. 655–665.

29. Deffains-Crapsky, C. and Sudolska, A. (2014). Radical innovation and early stage financing gaps: equity-based crowdfunding challenges. Journal of Positive Management. Vol. 5, no. 2. P. 3–19.

30. Aghion P., A Bergeaud and J. Van Reenen (2021), The Impact of Regulation on Innovation, CEPR Press Discussion Paper No. 28381. 74 p.

31. Witt, U. (2016). Propositions about novelty. Rethinking Economic Evolution. Edward Elgar Publishing. P. 105–114.

32. Domnich E. L. (2020). Tekhnologicheskie innovatsii v ekonomike regionov Rossii: mify i fakty [Technological innovations in the economy of Russian regions: myths and facts]. In: Novaya aziatskaya politika i razvitie Dal’nego Vostoka Rossii: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, Khabarovsk, 04–05 dekabrya 2019 goda [New Asian Policy and Development of the Russian Far East: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, Khabarovsk, December 04–05, 2019]. Ed. by P. A. Minakir. Khabarovsk: Institut ekonomicheskikh issledovanii Dal’nevostochnogo otdeleniya RAN. P. 92–95. (In Russ.).

33. Timurshina, V. R. and Tretyakova, E. A. (2018). Analysis of foreign economic activity of the Perm region. Vestnik Prikamskogo sotsial’nogo instituta. No. 2 (80). P. 130–139. (In Russ.).

34. Samovoleva, S. A. (2021). Innovation in export and absorption of foreign knowledge. Economics and Mathematical Methods. Vol. 57, no. 2. P. 21–33. (In Russ.).

35. Fagerberg, J. and Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies – The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research policy. Vol. 38, no. 2. P. 218–233.

36. Edwards-Schachter, M. (2018). The nature and variety of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Studies. Vol. 2, no. 2. P. 65–79.
Article

Received: 15.10.2022

Accepted: 26.12.2022

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Samovoleva, S. A. (2022). Radical and Incremental Innovations: Difficulties in Definition and Differentiation. Science Management: Theory and Practice, 4(4), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.7
Section
Problems of Innovation Development