CRIS Systems in Research Organization Administrating
Research Article
How to Cite
Alperin B.L., Zibareva I.V., Vedyagin A.A. CRIS Systems in Research Organization Administrating. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2022. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 143-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.1.8 (in Russ.).
Abstract
Complementary to storage, management and exchange of scientific metadata, the CRIS system SciAct of the Boreskov Institute of Catalysis by means of special modules provides online support for a number of standard business processes regarding to research organization’s (RO) everyday administrating. The processes cover: preparing of expert judgments on research materials submitting for publication; preparing of applications on filling of vacant positions, together with conducting of corresponding competitions; conducting of open or / and secret voting of Academic and Dissertation Councils including generating of corresponding protocols; administrating of documents and procedures regarding to postgraduateeducation; as well as some other processes. This substantially simplifies inner document flow of RO and facilitates personnel’s online / remote work from the one hand; and provides comfortable conditions for genuine research activities from the other hand. Flexibility of the SciAct system allows embracing of additional business processes, as well as already realized its exploitation at other ROs.
Keywords:
administrating scientific research, business processes, CRIS systems, Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, SciAct system, remote work
References
1. Weske, M. (2012). Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
2. Fayol H., Emerson H., Taylor F. and Ford H. (1992). Obschee i promyshlennoe upravlenie. In: Upravlenie – eto nauka i iskusstvo. Moscow: Respublica, P. 20–84. (In Russ.).
3. Bryant, R., Clements, A., de Castro, P. [et al.] (2018). Practices and patterns in research information management: findings from a global survey. OCLC Online Computer Library. Dublin. DOI: 10.25333/BGFG-D241.
4. Konobevtsev F., Laas N., Gurova E. and Romanova I. (2019). Remote work: technologies and experience of the organization. Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Upravleniya. Vol. 1, no. 7. P. 9–17. DOI: 10.26425/1816-4277-2019-7-9-17 (In Russ.).
5. Koroleva V. V., Ivanov O. V., Vedyagin A. A. [et al.] (2020). Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the publication activity of Russian research institutions in the field of applied chemistry. Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry. Vol. 93, no. 9. P. 1275–1281. DOI: 10.31857/S0044461820090030.
6. Koroleva V. V., Ivanov O. V., Vedyagin A. A. [et al.] (2020). Publication activity as a research efficiency indicator by the example of chemical organizations. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Vol. 90, no. 10. P. 948–958. DOI: 10.31857/S0869587320100060 (In Russ.).
7. Alperin B. L., Vedyagin A. A. and Zibareva I. V. (2015). SciAct – an information-analytical system of the Institute of Catalysis of SB RAS for monitoring and promoting research activities. Trudy GPNTB SO RAN [Proceedings of SPSTL SB RAS]. Vol. 9. P. 95–102. (In Russ.).
8. Lammey R. Crossref text and data mining services (2015). Science Editing. Vol. 2. P. 22–27. DOI: 10.6087/kcse.32.
9. Alperin B. L., Zibareva I. V. and Vedyagin A. A. Analysis of scholarly articles’ publication speed with the SciAct CRIS system (2020). Bibliosfera [Bibliosphere]. No. 1. P. 83–92. DOI: 10.20913/1815-3186-2020-1-83-92 (In Russ.)
2. Fayol H., Emerson H., Taylor F. and Ford H. (1992). Obschee i promyshlennoe upravlenie. In: Upravlenie – eto nauka i iskusstvo. Moscow: Respublica, P. 20–84. (In Russ.).
3. Bryant, R., Clements, A., de Castro, P. [et al.] (2018). Practices and patterns in research information management: findings from a global survey. OCLC Online Computer Library. Dublin. DOI: 10.25333/BGFG-D241.
4. Konobevtsev F., Laas N., Gurova E. and Romanova I. (2019). Remote work: technologies and experience of the organization. Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Upravleniya. Vol. 1, no. 7. P. 9–17. DOI: 10.26425/1816-4277-2019-7-9-17 (In Russ.).
5. Koroleva V. V., Ivanov O. V., Vedyagin A. A. [et al.] (2020). Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the publication activity of Russian research institutions in the field of applied chemistry. Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry. Vol. 93, no. 9. P. 1275–1281. DOI: 10.31857/S0044461820090030.
6. Koroleva V. V., Ivanov O. V., Vedyagin A. A. [et al.] (2020). Publication activity as a research efficiency indicator by the example of chemical organizations. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Vol. 90, no. 10. P. 948–958. DOI: 10.31857/S0869587320100060 (In Russ.).
7. Alperin B. L., Vedyagin A. A. and Zibareva I. V. (2015). SciAct – an information-analytical system of the Institute of Catalysis of SB RAS for monitoring and promoting research activities. Trudy GPNTB SO RAN [Proceedings of SPSTL SB RAS]. Vol. 9. P. 95–102. (In Russ.).
8. Lammey R. Crossref text and data mining services (2015). Science Editing. Vol. 2. P. 22–27. DOI: 10.6087/kcse.32.
9. Alperin B. L., Zibareva I. V. and Vedyagin A. A. Analysis of scholarly articles’ publication speed with the SciAct CRIS system (2020). Bibliosfera [Bibliosphere]. No. 1. P. 83–92. DOI: 10.20913/1815-3186-2020-1-83-92 (In Russ.)
Article
Received: 24.01.2022
Accepted: 28.03.2022
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Alperin, B. L., Zibareva, I. V., & Vedyagin, A. A. (2022). CRIS Systems in Research Organization Administrating. Science Management: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.1.8
Section
Information Environment and Issues of Digitalization
