Reforming science in Russia through the eyes of youth

Research Article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.4.2
How to Cite
Ablazhey A.M. Reforming science in Russia through the eyes of youth. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2020. Vol. 2. No. 4. P. 34-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.4.2

Abstract

The article is devoted to elucidating the spectrum of opinions of young (up to 35 years old) employees of the Scientific Research Institute of Scientific Centers of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Krasnoyarsk, Tomsk, Irkutsk) about the radical reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences, science as a profession, its place and role in the country, and the value of fundamental science. The bulk of the respondents were chairmen and active members of the Councils of young scientists of institutes. The evidence of serious claims presented by scientific youth to the current style of leadership of science by the state is shown, it is shown that with the transfer of control levers to the hands of the Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations (FANO), this problem has not lost its relevance, in particular, the results show a high degree of dissatisfaction young people the established practice of budget financing of scientific research, which is characterized primarily by the instability of the receipt of funds. It is shown that for scientific youth the problem of stability, predictability of the situation, the possibility of deep planning of the research horizon is no less important than for senior colleagues. A significant proportion of respondents radically assessed thesituation inside the RAS. Recognizing the undoubted importance of the Academy of Sciences for the development and organization of scientific research, young scientists insisted on the need for academic science to meet the time, timely and adequately responding to all kinds of challenges. It was this Academy of Sciences, in their opinion, that was not enough, which became one of the most important prerequisites for reform. Assessing the criteria and mechanisms for assessing the intensity and effectiveness of scientific work (from science as a whole to a specific institute and an individual scientist), young researchers also expressedwell-grounded claims, emphasizing the dominance of formal scientometric indicators in post-reform Russian science. Assessing the relevance of the task of rejuvenating science, noticeable personnel shifts, many respondents recognized its importance; at the same time, in their opinion, such a task was not in the spotlight. Young employees of academic research institutes did not support the widespread opinion about the sharp activation of scientific emigration among young people in connection with the reform. In general, the scientific youth, when assessing the prospects of both science in Russia as a whole and their own, expressedcautious optimism.
Keywords:
scientific youth, reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences, adaptation, scientific emigration, personnel, assessment systems, prospects

Author Biography

Anatoly M. Ablazhey, Institute of Philosophy and Law, Siberian branch of the RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Candidate of Sci. Phil., Leading Researcher

References

1. Proekt federal’nogo zakona «O Rossijskoj Akademii nauk, reorganizacii gosudarstvennyh akademij nauk i vnesenii izmenenij v otdel’nye zakonodatel’nye akty Rossijskoj Federacii» No 3690p-P8 ot 28.06.2013 [Draft Federal law “On the Russian Academy of Sciences, Reorganizing State Academies of Sciences and Amending Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation”] (2013). URL: http://static.consultant.ru/obj/file/doc/pr_fz010713.pdf (accessed: 19.05.2020). (In Russ.)

2. Antonovich, D. (2010). Nevozmozhnoe vozmozhno. Modernizaciya Pol’skoj akademii nauk [The impossible is possible. Modernization of the Polish Academy of Sciences]. Foresight. Vol. 4. No. 4. Pp. 32–38. (In Russ.).

3. Mirskaya, E. Z. (2009). Reformirovanie RAN: rezul’taty i perspektivy (sociologicheskoe issledovanie mneniya akademicheskih uchenyh) [Reforming of the Russian Academy of Sciences: results and prospects (sociological study of the academic scientists opinion)]. Science and power: the problem of communications. Conference Materials. Moscow. Pp. 169–172. (In Russ.).

4. Dezhina, I. G. (2014). Reforma RAN: prichiny i posledstvija dlja nauki v Rossii [Reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences: causes and consequences for science in Russia]. Мoscow, IFRI, Centre Russia/NIS. 29 p. (In Russ.).

5. Fedukin, I. (2009). Rossijskaja nauka: ot krizisa kachestva k poisku tochek rosta [Russian science: from the quality crisis to the search for growth points]. POLIT.RU. December 16. URL: http://www.polit.ru/article/2009/12/16/russcience/ (accessed 19.05.2020) (In Russ.).

6. Ablazhey, A. M. (2018). Radikal’naya reforma Rossijskoj Akademii nauk: razrabotka, realizaciya, ocenka nauchnym soobshchestvom [Radical reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences: design, realization, estimation by the scientific community]. Ideas and Ideals. No. 1 (35). Vol. 2. Pp. 29–52. (In Russ.).

7. Kupershtoh, N. A. (2020). Reforma RAN 2013 g. i ee posledstviya dlya regional’nyh nauchnyh centrov (na primere Sibirskogo otdeleniya RAN [The Reform of the RAS 2013 and its consequences for regional scientific centers (on the example of the Siberian branch of the RAS)]. Science Management: Theory and Practice. Vol. 2. No. 1. Pp. 54–68. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.1.3

8. Semenov, E. V. (2020). Proizvodstvo pokazatelej kak mekhanizm podavleniya proizvodstva znanij, tekhnologij i kompetenci [Production of indicators as a mechanism for suppression of production the knowledge, technology and competencies]. Science management: Theory and Practice. Vol. 2. No. 1. Pp. 61–93. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.1.4

9. Gvozdeva, E. S. and Vysockij, E. V. (2005). Est’ li stimul rabotat’ v rossijskoj nauke? [Is there an incentive to work in Russian science?]. Higher Education. No. 1. Pp. 99–109. (In Russ.).

10. Ablazhey, A. M. and Golovko, N. V. (2012). Akademicheskaya nauka v sovremennom obshchestve [The Academic Science in the modern Society]. Novosibirsk, NSU. 2012. 302 p. (In Russ.).

11. Gordienko, A. A., Eremin, S. N., Plyusnin, Yu. M., Putilov, A. A. and Ablazhej, A. M. (1997). Novosibirskij Akademgorodok v 1996 g.: usloviya zhizni i deyatel’nostiuchenyh [Novosibirsk Academgorodok in 1996: living conditions and activities of scientists]. Sociological Studies. No. 12. Pp. 68–77. (In Russ.).

12. Ablazhej, A. M. (2012). Akademicheskie soobshchestva nauchnyh centrov Sibirskogo otdeleniya RAN: po materialam issledovanij 2009–2010 godov [Academic communities of scientific centers of the Siberian Branch RAS: on research materials from 2009–2010]. Sociology of Science and Technology. Vol. 3. No. 1. Pp. 14–23. (In Russ.).
Article

Received: 10.06.2020

Accepted: 23.12.2020

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Ablazhey, A. M. (2020). Reforming science in Russia through the eyes of youth. Science Management: Theory and Practice, 2(4), 34-51. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.4.2
Issue
Vol 2 No 4 (2020): Science Management: Theory And Practice
Section
Mechanisms of a state regulation of a scientific activity