Наукометрия: немного истории и современные российские реалии
Для цитирования
Москалёва О. В., Акоев М. А. Наукометрия: немного истории и современные российские реалии // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2019. Том 1. № 1. С. 135-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2019.1.1.5
Аннотация
Приводится краткая история возникновения и развития наукометрии, описывается практика использования наукометрии для оценки научной деятельности в России. Особый упор делается на проблемы использования конкретных показателей и ошибки в их использовании. Предлагаются возможные варианты использования библиометрических показателей, учитывающие международный опыт.
Ключевые слова:
наукометрия, библиометрия, оценка научной деятельности, международный опыт,
Литература
Налимов В. В., Мульченко З. М. Наукометрия. Изучение развития науки как информационного процесса. М: Наука, 1969. 192 c.
Csiszar A. The catalogue that made metrics, and changed science // Nature. 2017. Vol. 551. № 7679. P. 163–165.
Gross P. L., Gross E. M. College libraries and chemical education // Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1927. Vol. 66. № 1713. P. 385–389.
Garfield E. Science Citation Index // Sci. Cit. Index. 1961. Vol. 1. P. 5–16.
Garfield E. Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas // Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1955. Vol. 122. № 3159. С. 108–111.
Руководство по наукометрии: индикаторы развития науки и технологий / [М. А. Акоев, В. А. Маркусова и др.]; под. ред. М. А. Акоева. Екатеринбург: Издательство УрФУ, 2014. 250 c. DOI: 10.15826/B978-5-7996-1352-5.0000.
Moskaleva O. Russian index of Science citation: Overview and review / O. Moskaleva, V. Pislyakov, I. Sterligov, M. Akoev, S. Shabanova // Scientometrics. Springer Netherlands. 2018. Vol. 116. № 1. P. 449–462.
González-Pereira B., Guerrero-Bote V. P., Moya-Anegón F. A new approach to the metric of journals scientific prestige: The SJR indicator // J. Informetr. 2010. Vol. 4. № 3. P. 379–391.
Moed H. F. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals // J. Informetr. 2010. Vol. 4. № 3. P. 265–277.
Guerrero-Bote V., Moya-Anegón F. A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator // J. Informetr. 2012. Vol. 6. № 4. P. 674–688.
Пополнение в семействе. Наукометрических показателей становится все больше. [Электронный ресурс] // Поиск — новости науки и техники. 2017. № 9–10. URL: https://www.poisknews.ru/magazine/22830/ (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
Hirsch J. E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes i nto account the effect of multiple coauthorship // Scientometrics. 2010. Vol. 85. № 3. P. 741–754.
Alonso S. H-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields / S. Alonso, F. J. Cabrerizo, E. HerreraViedma, F. Herrera // Journal of Informetrics. 2009. Vol. 3. № 4. P. 273–289.
Hirsch J. E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. National Academy of Sciences. 2005. Vol. 102. № 46. P. 16569–16572.
Moed H. F. CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group’s publication oeuvre // Journal of Informetrics. 2010. Vol. 4. № 3. P. 436–438.
QS World University Rankings — Methodology [Электронный ресурс] // Top Universities: [веб-сайт]. URL: https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-worlduniversity-rankings/methodology (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
World University Rankings 2019: methodology [Электронный ресурс] // Times Higher Education (THE): [веб-сайт]. URL: https://www. timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/methodology-worlduniversity-rankings-2019 (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
Указ Президента Российской Федерации от 01.12.2016 г. № 642 [Электронный ресурс] // Президент России: [веб-сайт]. URL: http://kremlin.ru/acts/ bank/41449 (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
Frascati Manual 2015 [Электронный ресурс] // OECD: [веб-сайт]. 2015. URL: https://www.oecd.org/publications/frascati-manual-2015-9789264239012- en.htm (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
Коллинз Р. Социология философии: глобальная теория интеллектуального изменения / Р. Коллинз; Пер. с англ. Н. С Розова, и Ю. Б. Вертгейм. Новосибирск: Сибирский хронограф, 2002. 1282 c.
Helsinki Initiative on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication [Электронный ресурс] // Helsinki-initiative.org: [веб-сайт]. URL: https://www. helsinki-initiative.org/ (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
Moed H. F., Markusova V., Akoev M. Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science // Scientometrics. 2018. Vol. 116. № 2. P. 1153–1180.
Стерлигов И. Пятилетка невиданного роста: библиометрические макроиндикаторы 2012−2016 годов [Электронный ресурс] // Троицкий вариант. Наука. 2017. № 227. С. 4. URL: http://trv-science.ru/2017/04/25/pyatiletkanevidannogo-rosta/ (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment [Электронный ресурс] // DORA: [веб-сайт]. 2012. URL: https://sfdora.org/read/ (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
Hicks D. et al. The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics // Nature. 2015. Vol. 520. P. 429–431. DOI: 10.1038/520429a.
Библиометрия во благо российской науки [Электронный ресурс] // АНРИ: [веб-сайт]. URL: https://rasep.ru/sovet-po-etike/bibliometriya-vo-blagorossijskoj-nauki (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
Snowball Metrics [Электронный ресурс] // Snowball Metrics: [веб-сайт]. URL: https://www.snowballmetrics.com/ (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
Goodhart C. A. E. Problems of Monetary Management: The UK Experience // Monetary Theory and Practice. Palgrave. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1984. P. 91–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5_4.
REFERENCES
Nalimov, V., Mulchenko Z. (1969). Naukometriya [Scientometrics]. Moscow, Nauka. 192 р. (In Russ).
Csiszar, A. (2017). The catalogue that made metrics, and changed science. Nature. Vol. 551. No 7679. P. 163–165. doi: 10.1038/551163a.
Gross, P., Gross, E. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science (New York, N.Y.). American Association for the Advancement of Science. Vol. 66. No. 1713. P. 385–389. doi: 10.1126/science.66.1713.385.
Garfield, E. (1961). Science Citation Index. Science Citation Index. Vol. 1. P. 5–16.
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas. Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Vol. 122. No. 3159. P. 108–111. doi: 10.1126/science.122.3159.108.
Akoev, M. et al. (2014). Rukovodstvo po naukometrii: indikatori razvitiia naukii tehnologii [Guide to Scientometrics: Indicators of the Development of Science and Technology]. Edited by М. А. Акоев. UrFU. doi: 10.15826/B978-5-7996-1352-5.0000. 250 p. (In Russ).
Moskaleva, O. et al. (2018). Russian index of Science citation: Overview and review. Scientometrics. Springer Netherlands. Vol. 116. No. 1. P. 449–462. doi: 10.1007/s11192- 018-2758-y.
González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V. and Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics. P. 379–391. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002.
Moed, H. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 265–277. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002.
Guerrero-Bote, V. P. and Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 674–688. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.001.
Addition to the family. There are more and more scientific indicators. POISK — science and technology news. No. 9–10. 2017. URL: https://www.poisknews.ru/magazine/22830/ Accessed — 9 July 2019. (In Russ)
Hirsch, J. E. (2010). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics. Vol. 85. No. 3. P. 741–754. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0193-9.
Alonso, S. et al. (2009). H-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 273–289. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 102. No. 46. P. 16569–16572. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.0507655102.
Moed, H. (2010). CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group’s publication oeuvre. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 436–438. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.009.
QS World University Rankings — Methodology. Top Universities (19.06.2019). URL: https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings/methodology / Accessed — 9 July 2019.
World University Rankings 2019: methodology. Times Higher Education (THE) (no date). URL: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/ methodology-world-university-rankings-2019 / Accessed — 9 July 2019.
Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 01.12.2016 г. № 642 (no date). URL: http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41449 /Accessed — 9 July 2019. (In Russ)
Frascati Manual 2015 (2015). OECD (The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities). URL: https://www.oecd.org/publications/ frascati-manual-2015-9789264239012-en.htm // Accessed — 9 July 2019. doi: 10.1787/9789264239012-en.
Collins R. (1998). The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Harvard University Press. 1120 p.
Helsinki Initiative on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication.| Helsinki-initiative.org (no date). URL: https://www.helsinki-initiative.org/ Accessed — 9 July 2019.
Moed, H. F., Markusova, V. and Akoev, M. (2018). Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. Scientometrics. Vol. 116. No. 2. P. 1153–1180. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2769-8.
Sterligov, I. (2017). Five Years of Unprecedented Growth: Bibliometric Macro Indicators 2012–2016. Troitsky Variant — Nauka. No. 227. P. 4. URL: http://trv-science. ru/2017/04/25/pyatiletka-nevidannogo-rosta/ Accessed — 9 July 2019. (In Russ)
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2012). URLt: https://sfdora. org/read/ Accessed — 9 July 2019.
Hicks, D. et al. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature. Vol. 520. P. 429–431.
Bibliometrics for the benefit of Russian science (no date). URL: https://rasep.ru/ sovet-po-etike/bibliometriya-vo-blago-rossijskoj-nauki /Accessed — 15 July 2019. (In Russ)
Snowball Metrics — standardized research metrics — by the sector for the sector Snowball Metrics (no date). URL: https://www.snowballmetrics.com/ Accessed — 9 July 2019.
Goodhart, C. (1984). Problems of Monetary Management: The UK Experience. Monetary Theory and Practice. London: Macmillan Education UK, P. 91–121. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5_4.
Csiszar A. The catalogue that made metrics, and changed science // Nature. 2017. Vol. 551. № 7679. P. 163–165.
Gross P. L., Gross E. M. College libraries and chemical education // Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1927. Vol. 66. № 1713. P. 385–389.
Garfield E. Science Citation Index // Sci. Cit. Index. 1961. Vol. 1. P. 5–16.
Garfield E. Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas // Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1955. Vol. 122. № 3159. С. 108–111.
Руководство по наукометрии: индикаторы развития науки и технологий / [М. А. Акоев, В. А. Маркусова и др.]; под. ред. М. А. Акоева. Екатеринбург: Издательство УрФУ, 2014. 250 c. DOI: 10.15826/B978-5-7996-1352-5.0000.
Moskaleva O. Russian index of Science citation: Overview and review / O. Moskaleva, V. Pislyakov, I. Sterligov, M. Akoev, S. Shabanova // Scientometrics. Springer Netherlands. 2018. Vol. 116. № 1. P. 449–462.
González-Pereira B., Guerrero-Bote V. P., Moya-Anegón F. A new approach to the metric of journals scientific prestige: The SJR indicator // J. Informetr. 2010. Vol. 4. № 3. P. 379–391.
Moed H. F. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals // J. Informetr. 2010. Vol. 4. № 3. P. 265–277.
Guerrero-Bote V., Moya-Anegón F. A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator // J. Informetr. 2012. Vol. 6. № 4. P. 674–688.
Пополнение в семействе. Наукометрических показателей становится все больше. [Электронный ресурс] // Поиск — новости науки и техники. 2017. № 9–10. URL: https://www.poisknews.ru/magazine/22830/ (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
Hirsch J. E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes i nto account the effect of multiple coauthorship // Scientometrics. 2010. Vol. 85. № 3. P. 741–754.
Alonso S. H-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields / S. Alonso, F. J. Cabrerizo, E. HerreraViedma, F. Herrera // Journal of Informetrics. 2009. Vol. 3. № 4. P. 273–289.
Hirsch J. E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. National Academy of Sciences. 2005. Vol. 102. № 46. P. 16569–16572.
Moed H. F. CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group’s publication oeuvre // Journal of Informetrics. 2010. Vol. 4. № 3. P. 436–438.
QS World University Rankings — Methodology [Электронный ресурс] // Top Universities: [веб-сайт]. URL: https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-worlduniversity-rankings/methodology (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
World University Rankings 2019: methodology [Электронный ресурс] // Times Higher Education (THE): [веб-сайт]. URL: https://www. timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/methodology-worlduniversity-rankings-2019 (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
Указ Президента Российской Федерации от 01.12.2016 г. № 642 [Электронный ресурс] // Президент России: [веб-сайт]. URL: http://kremlin.ru/acts/ bank/41449 (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
Frascati Manual 2015 [Электронный ресурс] // OECD: [веб-сайт]. 2015. URL: https://www.oecd.org/publications/frascati-manual-2015-9789264239012- en.htm (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
Коллинз Р. Социология философии: глобальная теория интеллектуального изменения / Р. Коллинз; Пер. с англ. Н. С Розова, и Ю. Б. Вертгейм. Новосибирск: Сибирский хронограф, 2002. 1282 c.
Helsinki Initiative on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication [Электронный ресурс] // Helsinki-initiative.org: [веб-сайт]. URL: https://www. helsinki-initiative.org/ (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
Moed H. F., Markusova V., Akoev M. Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science // Scientometrics. 2018. Vol. 116. № 2. P. 1153–1180.
Стерлигов И. Пятилетка невиданного роста: библиометрические макроиндикаторы 2012−2016 годов [Электронный ресурс] // Троицкий вариант. Наука. 2017. № 227. С. 4. URL: http://trv-science.ru/2017/04/25/pyatiletkanevidannogo-rosta/ (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment [Электронный ресурс] // DORA: [веб-сайт]. 2012. URL: https://sfdora.org/read/ (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
Hicks D. et al. The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics // Nature. 2015. Vol. 520. P. 429–431. DOI: 10.1038/520429a.
Библиометрия во благо российской науки [Электронный ресурс] // АНРИ: [веб-сайт]. URL: https://rasep.ru/sovet-po-etike/bibliometriya-vo-blagorossijskoj-nauki (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
Snowball Metrics [Электронный ресурс] // Snowball Metrics: [веб-сайт]. URL: https://www.snowballmetrics.com/ (дата обращения: 09.07.2019).
Goodhart C. A. E. Problems of Monetary Management: The UK Experience // Monetary Theory and Practice. Palgrave. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1984. P. 91–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5_4.
REFERENCES
Nalimov, V., Mulchenko Z. (1969). Naukometriya [Scientometrics]. Moscow, Nauka. 192 р. (In Russ).
Csiszar, A. (2017). The catalogue that made metrics, and changed science. Nature. Vol. 551. No 7679. P. 163–165. doi: 10.1038/551163a.
Gross, P., Gross, E. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science (New York, N.Y.). American Association for the Advancement of Science. Vol. 66. No. 1713. P. 385–389. doi: 10.1126/science.66.1713.385.
Garfield, E. (1961). Science Citation Index. Science Citation Index. Vol. 1. P. 5–16.
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas. Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Vol. 122. No. 3159. P. 108–111. doi: 10.1126/science.122.3159.108.
Akoev, M. et al. (2014). Rukovodstvo po naukometrii: indikatori razvitiia naukii tehnologii [Guide to Scientometrics: Indicators of the Development of Science and Technology]. Edited by М. А. Акоев. UrFU. doi: 10.15826/B978-5-7996-1352-5.0000. 250 p. (In Russ).
Moskaleva, O. et al. (2018). Russian index of Science citation: Overview and review. Scientometrics. Springer Netherlands. Vol. 116. No. 1. P. 449–462. doi: 10.1007/s11192- 018-2758-y.
González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V. and Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics. P. 379–391. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002.
Moed, H. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 265–277. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002.
Guerrero-Bote, V. P. and Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 674–688. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.001.
Addition to the family. There are more and more scientific indicators. POISK — science and technology news. No. 9–10. 2017. URL: https://www.poisknews.ru/magazine/22830/ Accessed — 9 July 2019. (In Russ)
Hirsch, J. E. (2010). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics. Vol. 85. No. 3. P. 741–754. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0193-9.
Alonso, S. et al. (2009). H-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 273–289. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 102. No. 46. P. 16569–16572. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.0507655102.
Moed, H. (2010). CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group’s publication oeuvre. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 436–438. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.009.
QS World University Rankings — Methodology. Top Universities (19.06.2019). URL: https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings/methodology / Accessed — 9 July 2019.
World University Rankings 2019: methodology. Times Higher Education (THE) (no date). URL: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/ methodology-world-university-rankings-2019 / Accessed — 9 July 2019.
Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 01.12.2016 г. № 642 (no date). URL: http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41449 /Accessed — 9 July 2019. (In Russ)
Frascati Manual 2015 (2015). OECD (The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities). URL: https://www.oecd.org/publications/ frascati-manual-2015-9789264239012-en.htm // Accessed — 9 July 2019. doi: 10.1787/9789264239012-en.
Collins R. (1998). The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Harvard University Press. 1120 p.
Helsinki Initiative on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication.| Helsinki-initiative.org (no date). URL: https://www.helsinki-initiative.org/ Accessed — 9 July 2019.
Moed, H. F., Markusova, V. and Akoev, M. (2018). Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. Scientometrics. Vol. 116. No. 2. P. 1153–1180. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2769-8.
Sterligov, I. (2017). Five Years of Unprecedented Growth: Bibliometric Macro Indicators 2012–2016. Troitsky Variant — Nauka. No. 227. P. 4. URL: http://trv-science. ru/2017/04/25/pyatiletka-nevidannogo-rosta/ Accessed — 9 July 2019. (In Russ)
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2012). URLt: https://sfdora. org/read/ Accessed — 9 July 2019.
Hicks, D. et al. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature. Vol. 520. P. 429–431.
Bibliometrics for the benefit of Russian science (no date). URL: https://rasep.ru/ sovet-po-etike/bibliometriya-vo-blago-rossijskoj-nauki /Accessed — 15 July 2019. (In Russ)
Snowball Metrics — standardized research metrics — by the sector for the sector Snowball Metrics (no date). URL: https://www.snowballmetrics.com/ Accessed — 9 July 2019.
Goodhart, C. (1984). Problems of Monetary Management: The UK Experience. Monetary Theory and Practice. London: Macmillan Education UK, P. 91–121. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5_4.
Форматы цитирования
Другие форматы цитирования:
APA
Москалёва, О. В., & Акоев, М. А. (2019). Наукометрия: немного истории и современные российские реалии. Управление наукой: теория и практика, 1(1), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2019.1.1.5
Раздел
Наука в зеркале наукометрии
